Kamala’s Elephant Metaphor: A Lesson in Leadership or a Zoo Experience?

Kamala Harris had a moment of rare public outing this week when the United States quickly remembered (and was reminded) why they don’t so often see the former Vice President. At a California fundraiser, Harris started with the usual talking points, then veered off into what felt like a wildlife documentary. Somewhere along the path between criticizing and denouncing Donald Trump’s tariffs, and throwing her support behind the mode of socialism championed by fellow Californian Bernie Sanders, she cut sharply left into the animal preserve. What imagery did she use to describe America’s soul? Elephants. In the San Diego Zoo. In an earthquake. Apparently, following a recent earthquake, the zoo posted a video of elephants gathering around a baby elephant to shield it. This powerful moment was quoted by Harris during her speech. “Everybody’s asking me what I think about these days… That video of elephants at the San Diego Zoo during the earthquake,” she stated, showcasing her emotional engagement with the topic.

Harris clearly took self-satisfaction in her reference to the baby elephant and asked the crowd to raise their hands if they had seen the video. Those who hadn’t were encouraged to Google it, turning a political address into an interactive session reminiscent of a classroom setting. “They stood in a circle to defend the most defenseless,” she exclaimed, with wide eyes and a rising voice. Those present seemed captivated, nodding along as if they were sharing in a moral lesson rather than witnessing a political address. However, analyzing her approach, it becomes evident that the metaphor may have crossed a line from being insightful to being trivial. While metaphors can enrich speeches, this leaned towards a whimsical anecdote rather than a profound insight into leadership. It’s classic Kamala Harris — the gestures, the laughter before the punchline, and the punchline that never comes. It reflects an inclination to simplify complex matters, perhaps underestimating the audience. In her attempt to draw parallels between her political journey and the survival instincts of elephants, she risks undercutting her credibility with adult voters. Moreover, while she attempts to wipe the slate clean from her past—facing a failed campaign and an underwhelming vice presidency—she overlooks a fundamental reality: voters have memories. Comparing her audience to zoo animals during a discussion about serious political matters may lead some to feel patronized. Harris’s elephant anecdote raises questions about effective leadership and communication. Is drawing on animal metaphors a strategy to resonate with voters, or does it exhibit a disconnect from their realities? If she wishes to identify with a circle of elephants, she must also heed the adage: elephants never forget, and neither do voters. It’s crucial to remember that they may not appreciate being likened to creatures in captivity, especially amid pressing concerns that demand serious attention. As we reflect on this incident, how do you view the use of animal metaphors in political discourse? Are they effective in conveying messages, or do they dilute the seriousness of the topics at hand? Feel free to share your thoughts and join the conversation!

• Elephant Metaphor
• Kamala Harris
• San Diego Zoo